Kalispell Public Schools will have $90.7 million for operations during the 2025-26 school year, which administrators say will leave them with a stable high school budget, but a tight elementary district budget. 

State funding and taxpayer money are the primary sources of revenue for the district’s budgeted funds, the largest being the general fund. Property taxes accounted for about 33% of funding for the elementary district budget and 32.9% of the high school budget.  

The elementary district will operate on a $43.96 million budget, a percentage increase of 6.2% from the 2024-25 budget. Despite the bump, Kalispell Public Schools Finance Director Chris Campbell said the budget may face a deficit, even after the elimination of about 15 full-time-equivalent positions.  

“We'll probably face an ongoing challenge on the elementary side indefinitely, until we see some kind of structural, legislative changes. But for this year, they’ll be very, very tight,” he said during a presentation at an Aug. 12 board meeting before the budget adoption.  

The high school district budget totals $46.74 million, a percentage increase of 9.5% over the last school year's budget. The budget is stable, Campbell said, thanks in part to the passage of the $2.97 million general fund levy in May, which helped prevent the elimination of about 20 full-time-equivalent positions. 

COLLECTIVE BARGAINING agreements continue through the 2025-26 school year, with certified staff receiving a 10% increase to the base salary and a 2% increase at the top. A first-year teacher with a bachelor’s degree will earn a $47,713 salary, for example. Non-union employees will receive a 3% increase for 2025-26.  

Kalispell Public Schools ratified the certified staff contract, anticipating that the Student and Teacher Advancement for Results and Success Act, also known as the STARS Act, would earn the Legislature’s approval. The act incentivizes Montana school districts to raise teachers’ starting salaries in addition to fully funding the Advanced Opportunities Act, which affects dual credit and work-based learning.  

The act was signed into law in May and will provide financial relief to the tune of about $900,000 for the elementary district and about $800,000 for the high school district, Campbell said.  

"... It was a bet and a risk and one that paid off,” he said.  

Campbell reiterated the disparity of the state funding formula between elementary and high schools, noting that the district receives $1,450 less per pupil in elementary school compared to the high school level. He said this is compounded by accreditation standards that require smaller class sizes in the elementary grades, necessitating more staff. Campbell and Superintendent Mark Jensen said they have not been provided with a rationale as to why less funding is given to educate elementary students.  

At the state level, a decennial school funding interim study is underway. State law requires a school funding interim commission, made up of legislators and members of the public, be formed every 10 years to “to reassess the educational needs and costs related to the basic system of free quality public elementary and secondary schools; and if necessary, recommend to the following Legislature changes to the state's funding formula.”   

In addition to budgeted funds, the elementary and high school districts hold cash funds. Cash funds fluctuate and cover food service, student activities, traffic education and health insurance, for example.   

An interlocal fund is also under cash funds. The interlocal fund contains year-end money from the elementary and high school districts and may be spent on various projects with board approval.  

The current balance of the interlocal fund is $2.7 million. Since the interlocal fund was put into place in 2011, the district has used it like a savings account of sorts to accumulate money over time to fund large projects, purchases and other expenses. It has also been used to cover shortfalls and float a loan to the district’s self-funded insurance program.  

TO ADDRESS budget sustainability, Kalispell Public Schools is proposing changes to how it handles staffing levels and maintenance and building expenses, which Campbell outlined at the August board meeting. 

Regarding staffing — the district’s biggest expense — administrators are working on creating staffing metrics. The goal of the metrics is to “allow for incremental adjustments, not crisis corrections; provide an objective framework to evaluate future staffing decisions that are transparent, and fiscally responsible; provide consistency and equity in line with enrollment at each building.”  

The district anticipates completing middle and high school instructional metrics in September. Once completed, the creation of custodial, maintenance, clerical and other support staff metrics will get underway. The district proposes reviewing staff levels in February, after the second statewide official enrollment count is completed (the first is taken in October). State funding is tied directly to enrollment.  

“Once that second count is done, we really have a very, very, good idea of what our budget will be for the coming year and we can kind of evaluate our staffing ratios based on current enrollment,” Campbell said.  

“Whether it’s adding or reducing, really, in an effort to avoid any significant types of corrections like we had to do this past year,” he added.  

Kalispell Public Schools also plans to bring district-level oversight to capital expenditures over $25,000, along with asking school sites to submit needs and wants to further improve financial stability as one of Flathead County’s largest employers.  

The requests and projects would then be prioritized district-wide to ensure critical needs are addressed over lower-priority projects, which has been an issue in the past, allowing for multi-year planning. Requests would be collected through a standardized form posted in September, with submissions closed in October of a given school year. In November, the district would review and prioritize requests and conduct the bidding process from January through April. The suggested timeline would allow the district to earmark money 14 months in advance to better inform the district of fixed costs and operational budgets.  

In his budget summary, Campbell said the district will need to use general funds, building reserve funds and technology funds to address significant deferred maintenance and safety issues. 

Reporter Hilary Matheson may be reached at 758-4431 or [email protected].